By Hamed Soleimanzadeh
Cinema has long been celebrated as a powerful medium for expressing dissent, challenging societal norms, and reflecting on the complexities of the human experience. Within this realm of cinematic activism, the name Abbas Kiarostami stands as a beacon of innovation and influence. His indelible mark on Iranian and global cinema resonates not only in the aesthetic tapestry he wove but also in the profound impact he left on the evolution of protest cinema in Iran and the Middle East. This article embarks on a journey to unveil the intricate interplay between Kiarostami’s cinema and the emergence of Iranian protest cinema, investigating the ways in which his groundbreaking techniques have shaped narratives of dissent and resistance.
Abbas Kiarostami hailed as a cinematic visionary, redefined storytelling conventions, prompting a paradigm shift that reverberated through the cinematic landscape. His oeuvre was a testament to his artistic audacity, blending elements of realism with allegory to create narratives that transcended the confines of traditional cinema. Films like Close-Up (1990) and Taste of Cherry (1997) bore witness to his masterful fusion of documentary authenticity with philosophical depth, inviting audiences into intimate dialogues with the characters’ inner struggles while simultaneously commenting on broader societal challenges.
Central to Kiarostami’s allure was his embrace of elliptical storytelling, a technique that encouraged viewers to become active participants in piecing together narrative fragments. This departure from linear narratives cultivated a space for introspection, challenging conventional cinema’s role as a passive entertainment medium. Kiarostami’s exploration of alternative narrative structures paved the way for filmmakers to infuse protest cinema with fresh vitality, allowing for the depiction of complex socio-political issues that resonated deeply with audiences.
As the stage of Iranian cinema transformed into a podium for socio-political expression, the emergence of protest cinema found fertile ground. Historical contexts of socio-political turbulence in Iran further catalyzed the development of cinematic narratives that sought to unravel the complexities of dissent and resistance. The confluence of Kiarostami’s cinematic prowess and Iran’s socio-political realities birthed a new era, a cinematic renaissance that showcased a profound interplay of realism, symbolism, and allegory. Kiarostami’s influence on Iranian protest cinema is not merely confined to surface aesthetics or technical innovations. His legacy lies in the thematic resonances that traverse time and space, creating a tapestry of narratives that meld individual experiences with larger societal struggles. The embodiment of personal and collective turmoil became emblematic of this cinematic movement, with filmmakers finding solace in Kiarostami’s precedent, one that offered a blueprint for navigating censorship and boldly addressing issues that had long been shrouded in silence.
The forthcoming exploration delves into the tapestry of Kiarostami’s cinematic techniques, the emergence of protest cinema, and the intersections that have paved the way for an enduring dialogue between them. The article will illuminate the ways in which Kiarostami’s cinematic legacy has transcended national borders, inspiring filmmakers across the Middle East and beyond to harness the power of cinema as a conduit for protest and societal transformation. Through this journey, it becomes evident that Kiarostami’s impact is not confined to the silver screen but has woven itself into the very fabric of contemporary protest cinema, articulating a poignant narrative of dissent, resilience, and the indomitable spirit of change.
Abbas Kiarostami’s cinematic techniques and narratives
Abbas Kiarostami’s cinematic legacy is a testament to his unwavering commitment to redefining the boundaries of storytelling and narrative conventions. His films, marked by a unique blend of realism and allegory, transcended the confines of traditional cinema, inviting audiences to engage with narratives that pulsated with life and philosophical resonance.
In films like Close-Up and Taste of Cherry, Kiarostami pioneered a form of realism that breathed authenticity into his narratives. He possessed an uncanny ability to capture the mundane aspects of daily life, juxtaposing them against broader existential questions. Close-Up exemplified this approach by blurring the lines between documentary and fiction, intertwining the real-life story of a man impersonating a filmmaker with the profound allegorical themes of identity, art, and human connection. Kiarostami’s adeptness at blurring these boundaries transformed his films into allegorical tapestries that mirrored the complexities of reality while inviting contemplation on universal truths. The notion of elliptical storytelling, a hallmark of Kiarostami’s cinema, invites viewers to become active participants in constructing the narrative’s meaning. In works like Certified Copy (2010), he thrusts audiences into a world where the boundaries between reality and illusion become hazy, prompting contemplation on the nature of authenticity and perception. This narrative experimentation shatters the linear progression expected in traditional cinema, demanding viewers to engage in a process of interpretation and introspection. Kiarostami’s narrative intricacies extend beyond mere plot; they become conduits for philosophical exploration, sparking conversations that transcend the screen.
Kiarostami’s indelible mark on cinema is underscored by his audacious willingness to challenge norms and subvert conventions. His propensity to eschew traditional storytelling structures is evident in films like Ten (2002), where a series of conversations unfold entirely within a car. This departure from conventional visual aesthetics is not merely an artistic quirk; it serves as a tool for deeper engagement. By unshackling his narratives from the limitations of traditional plot progression, Kiarostami empowers his viewers to engage actively with the characters’ inner worlds and reflect upon the broader societal dynamics at play. At the heart of Kiarostami’s cinema lies his commitment to viewer engagement. His films are an invitation, a challenge to the audience’s preconceived notions and expectations. The elliptical narratives, the blend of realism and allegory, and the deliberate ambiguity that shrouds his stories are all mechanisms to draw the viewer into a deeper, more introspective relationship with the narrative. The act of watching becomes an act of discovery, an exploration of the spaces between the words spoken and the emotions unspoken.
As we journey through the legacy of Abbas Kiarostami’s cinematic techniques and narratives, it becomes evident that his contribution to the world of cinema transcends the mere creation of films. Kiarostami’s cinema is an exploration of human complexity, a reflection of societal dynamics, and an open invitation for audiences to engage with the profound questions that permeate the human experience. In the subsequent sections of this article, we will delve into how these techniques have rippled through the fabric of Iranian protest cinema, breathing new life into narratives of dissent and resilience.
Socio-political dynamics in Iran and the emergence of protest cinema
The emergence of Iranian protest cinema is intricately interwoven with the socio-political landscape that has shaped the nation’s history. Iran’s modern history is marked by a series of transformative events, each leaving an indelible imprint on the collective consciousness of its people. From the Constitutional Revolution of the early 20th century to the 1979 Islamic Revolution and its aftermath, Iran has navigated waves of change, often accompanied by tension, upheaval, and the suppression of dissenting voices. It was within this charged environment that cinema emerged as a potent avenue for artistic expression and protest. The power of visual storytelling, unhindered by the constraints of traditional censorship, provided filmmakers with a canvas to articulate their perspectives, challenge authority, and document the experiences of individuals swept up in the tide of societal change. As Iran grappled with the socio-political repercussions of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, a new era of cinema emerged, offering a platform for artists to engage critically with the shifting contours of power and ideology. Iranian filmmakers found themselves in the unique position of navigating a delicate balance between creativity and state-sanctioned limitations, leading to the cultivation of a distinct cinematic language that carried hidden subtexts and veiled allegories.
Key Iranian protest films began to emerge, their narratives echoing the sentiments of a society in flux. Notable works like Jafar Panahi’s The Circle (2000) and Samira Makhmalbaf’s At Five in the Afternoon (2003) grappled with themes of gender inequality, political disillusionment, and the clash between tradition and modernity. These films adopted a nuanced approach, weaving personal narratives into the fabric of larger socio-political concerns, mirroring the very tensions that defined Iranian society. The thematic concerns of Iranian protest cinema are as diverse as the historical contexts that inspired them. These films explore themes of identity, human rights, religious and cultural tensions, and the resilience of the human spirit in the face of adversity. In many instances, allegorical storytelling, a technique inherited from predecessors like Abbas Kiarostami, enabled filmmakers to navigate censorship while delivering hard-hitting commentary on issues that were too sensitive to address directly. This intersection between personal narratives and societal struggles became a defining characteristic of Iranian protest cinema. Filmmakers channeled the spirit of their times into cinematic tales that reverberated with universal resonance, connecting with audiences on a visceral level and drawing attention to the voices of those who were often marginalized or silenced.
As we delve into the subsequent sections, we will unravel the profound influence of Abbas Kiarostami’s cinematic innovations on the evolution of Iranian protest cinema. By examining key films, narratives, and artistic techniques, we will illuminate the ways in which Kiarostami’s legacy provided filmmakers with a template for engaging with socio-political issues, amplifying dissent, and creating a dialogue that transcends national boundaries.
Influence on narrative approaches and visual aesthetics
Abbas Kiarostami’s imprint on Iranian protest cinema is akin to a guiding constellation, illuminating the paths for filmmakers to navigate the complexities of dissent and societal reflection. His innovative narrative approaches and visual aesthetics have reverberated through the works of subsequent generations, giving rise to a poignant cinematic dialogue that resonates with audiences worldwide. Kiarostami’s emphasis on blending realism with allegory, a hallmark of his cinema, has been a lodestar for Iranian filmmakers seeking to capture the profound while sidestepping overt censorship. The deeply personal stories woven into broader socio-political contexts, as exemplified by Kiarostami’s Taste of Cherry, have become a storytelling tradition that many contemporary protest films honor. These narratives offer a dual-layered experience, connecting the personal struggles of characters with the collective struggles of the society they inhabit.
The impact of Kiarostami’s elliptical storytelling is palpable in Iranian protest cinema, where narrative ambiguity serves as a tool for critical reflection. The legacy of his narrative experimentation finds resonance in films like Fireworks Wednesday (2006) by Asghar Farhadi, where complex interpersonal relationships become a lens through which wider societal tensions are examined. The narrative intricacies, often reflecting shades of Kiarostami’s influence, beckon audiences to dissect the layers of meaning hidden beneath the surface. However, Kiarostami’s influence is not limited to mere homage. Some Iranian filmmakers have ventured into uncharted territory, melding his techniques with their unique creative visions. Mohsen Makhmalbaf’s Kandahar (2001) is a testament to this departure, employing Kiarostami-inspired allegory to illuminate the plight of Afghan women while departing from Kiarostami’s signature restraint to create a visually arresting and emotionally charged narrative. The trajectory of Kiarostami’s influence extends beyond mere replication; it has catalyzed an evolution of protest cinema’s visual and narrative language. Films like A Separation (2011) by Asghar Farhadi underscore the dynamic interplay between Kiarostami’s legacy and contemporary storytelling. The nuanced exploration of societal intricacies, while rooted in Kiarostami’s ethos, ventures into explorations of moral ambiguity and ethical dilemmas that forge new ground. Moreover, Kiarostami’s boldness in subverting conventions has inspired filmmakers to test the boundaries of cinematic expression. In films like Crimson Gold (2003) by Jafar Panahi, there is a daring departure from linear narrative structures, where the disintegration of a protagonist’s psyche mirrors the fragmentation of societal norms.
As we transition into the subsequent sections, it becomes evident that Kiarostami’s cinematic influence is not confined to mimicry but has evolved into a dynamic dialogue between his legacy and the narratives of dissent that emerge from the contemporary Iranian protest cinema landscape. The influence is not about replication; it’s about the evolution of an artistic lineage that continues to transform, adapt, and amplify the voice of protest.
Shared socio-political themes: Kiarostami’s continuum
The essence of cinema as a tool of protest lies in its capacity to engage with societal themes that resonate across time and borders. In this regard, Abbas Kiarostami’s cinema and contemporary Iranian protest films share a symbiotic connection, drawn together by their exploration of shared socio-political themes. The struggles of individuals grappling with personal dilemmas against a backdrop of societal challenges are emblematic of Kiarostami’s narratives and continue to reverberate in the discourse of protest cinema. Kiarostami’s narratives inherently mirror the complexity of Iranian society, often touching on issues of identity, alienation, and the tension between tradition and modernity. His ability to craft allegories, as seen in The Wind Will Carry Us (1999), creates a tapestry where personal narratives become microcosms of broader societal dynamics. These themes provide fertile ground for protest cinema, allowing filmmakers to draw parallels between individual experiences and larger socio-political struggles.
In an environment where overt dissent might face censorship, allegorical storytelling emerges as a powerful tool to address sensitive subjects with subtlety. Kiarostami’s mastery of this technique has been a beacon for filmmakers seeking to navigate the complexities of societal criticism without attracting unwarranted attention. By couching contentious issues within layers of allegory, filmmakers create narratives that can be interpreted on multiple levels, inviting viewers to engage with the narrative’s surface and delve into its underlying meanings.
The allegorical approach, akin to a shield, offers filmmakers the freedom to engage with topics that might be deemed too incendiary under direct scrutiny. A Separation by Asghar Farhadi exemplifies this technique, exploring issues of class, gender, and morality within a narrative that showcases the complexities of interpersonal relationships. As viewers decode the layers of allegory, the narrative’s implications ripple into the broader societal landscape, fostering nuanced conversations that are crucial to the protest movement.
The power of allegory lies not only in its capacity to navigate censorship but also in its ability to catalyze reflection and dialogue. Iranian protest cinema, echoing Kiarostami’s influence, uses allegory as a means to provoke thought, challenge perceptions, and illuminate hidden truths. Taxi (2015) by Jafar Panahi exemplifies this transformational quality, employing the allegorical space of a taxi to engage with diverse passengers whose conversations weave a rich tapestry of socio-political commentary.
Kiarostami’s approach of blending realism with allegory finds particular resonance in the depiction of protest movements. Films like Ten (2002) by Kiarostami himself and Circumstance (2011) by Maryam Keshavarz exemplify how these techniques can translate personal experiences into allegorical commentaries on societal upheaval. The confined space of a car in Ten becomes a microcosm of Iranian society, allowing conversations to flow organically and revealing layers of dissent, compromise, and longing. Ten is emblematic of the power of Kiarostami-inspired techniques to amplify the impact of protest cinema. The confines of the car not only mirror societal dynamics but also create a claustrophobic intimacy that intensifies the emotional resonance of the conversations. This technique is echoed in Women Without Men (2009) by Shirin Neshat, where the enclosed garden becomes a metaphorical space in which the characters’ personal journeys intersect with wider socio-political struggles.
Moreover, Kiarostami’s narrative experimentation, as seen in Certified Copy (2010), finds echoes in No Date, No Signature (2017) by Vahid Jalilvand. Both films challenge the audience’s perception of reality, inviting viewers to grapple with the blurred lines between truth and illusion. In No Date, No Signature, this narrative ambiguity becomes a tool to explore themes of guilt and responsibility, encapsulating the complexity of social and moral challenges.
Kiarostami’s influence extends beyond narrative techniques to visual aesthetics that mirror the intricacies of personal struggles and societal challenges. Films like A Man of Integrity (2017) by Mohammad Rasoulof utilize Kiarostami’s penchant for landscapes and visual poetry to evoke a sense of isolation and moral dilemma. The use of desolate landscapes and minimalistic settings draws the viewer into the inner turmoil of the characters and their battles against systemic injustice.
As the subsequent sections beckon, it becomes evident that Kiarostami’s cinematic legacy has not only provided filmmakers with narrative techniques but has also shaped the very visual grammar through which the narratives of protest unfold. The power of cinematic language, harnessed through Kiarostami-inspired approaches, captures the essence of protest movements, the resilience of individuals, and the complexities of societal change, bringing them to life on the screen in a symphony of visual and narrative resonance.
Kiarostami’s resonance beyond borders
The impact of Abbas Kiarostami’s cinematic legacy transcends national boundaries, resonating with filmmakers and audiences around the world. His pioneering approaches to narrative and aesthetics have not only shaped the landscape of Iranian cinema but have also inspired a global movement of cinematic protest. Kiarostami’s influence extends far beyond his native Iran, becoming a touchstone for filmmakers grappling with their own socio-political contexts. Kiarostami’s legacy reverberates through the works of filmmakers from the Middle East and beyond. Filmmakers in countries with diverse sociopolitical climates have found solace in his narrative innovations, employing them to articulate their own stories of dissent, resilience, and societal reflection. For instance, the films of Nuri Bilge Ceylan from Turkey, such as Winter Sleep (2014), bear traces of Kiarostami’s influence in their contemplative exploration of existential themes and human relationships.
The influence of Kiarostami’s cinematic style goes beyond mere emulation; it undergoes a transnational transformation that adapts to local contexts. In Egypt, the film Clash (2016) by Mohamed Diab navigates the volatile sociopolitical landscape through a claustrophobic setting reminiscent of Kiarostami’s confined spaces. The influence here is not confined to narrative technique alone; it extends to the atmosphere of tension, reflecting Kiarostami’s ability to evoke powerful emotions through minimalistic aesthetics. Kiarostami’s ethos, characterized by a commitment to societal engagement, has found resonance in filmmakers like Jia Zhangke from China. His film A Touch of Sin (2013) employs Kiarostami’s techniques to explore the intersection of personal struggles with broader systemic issues, revealing the interconnectedness of individual experiences and societal challenges. These global echoes of Kiarostami’s influence underscore the universal nature of his cinematic language. His legacy has become a bridge between disparate cultures and contexts, a testament to the enduring power of cinema to transcend geographical boundaries and unite audiences through shared human experiences.
As we transition into the final sections of this exploration, it becomes evident that Kiarostami’s influence is not confined to a single nation or region. His cinematic innovations have become a rallying point for filmmakers across the globe, nurturing a transnational dialogue on protest cinema, resilience, and the indomitable spirit of change.
Conclusion: enduring legacy and protest cinema’s trajectory
Abbas Kiarostami’s cinematic legacy is a constellation of innovation, courage, and artistic audacity that continues to guide the trajectory of protest cinema in the region. His influence reaches beyond the screen, shaping the very essence of how filmmakers engage with dissent, societal reflection, and the human experience. As we reflect on his legacy, it becomes evident that his contributions have not only transformed the landscape of Iranian cinema but have also forged an enduring path for protest cinema to tread. Kiarostami’s cinematic toolbox, filled with narrative intricacies, allegorical brilliance, and the capacity to challenge norms, serves as a compass for filmmakers navigating the turbulent waters of societal upheaval. His techniques offer both an anchor and a sail, grounding narratives in a shared human experience while empowering filmmakers to set sail toward uncharted waters of narrative innovation. Following in the footsteps of a cinematic luminary like Abbas Kiarostami is a task that comes with both challenges and opportunities. The challenge lies in crafting original narratives that honor his legacy while forging unique paths of artistic expression. Filmmakers are tasked with striking a delicate balance between emulation and innovation, channeling Kiarostami’s influence to explore new dimensions of protest cinema. Opportunities arise from the vast canvas of Kiarostami’s legacy. Filmmakers can embrace his techniques as a springboard for transcending societal boundaries, using cinematic language as a bridge to address global issues of oppression, resilience, and hope. Kiarostami’s legacy invites filmmakers to engage with both the personal and the political, forging narratives that become catalysts for change, both within their own societies and on the global stage.
As we gaze into the future, it becomes evident that Kiarostami’s legacy is not a static monument but an ongoing dialogue. Contemporary protest cinema continues to evolve, absorbing his influence and transforming it into a powerful medium for reflecting on societal dynamics, political turbulence, and the innate human desire for change. Kiarostami’s legacy is not confined to a single era or nation; it transcends temporal and geographical boundaries to become a beacon that guides filmmakers toward the transformative potential of cinema.
Kiarostami’s ability to marry personal struggles with broader societal concerns resonates deeply in films that follow his footsteps. His legacy has been instrumental in nurturing a breed of filmmakers who harness cinema’s potential to dissect the complexities of Iranian society, amplify silenced voices, and ignite conversations that transcend geographic boundaries. As Iranian protest cinema continues to evolve,
Kiarostami’s legacy stands as a testament to the enduring power of art to inspire, provoke, and create dialogue.
In conclusion, Abbas Kiarostami’s legacy has become a prism through which we perceive the intersection of art and protest, narrative innovation, and societal reflection. His influence, evident in the techniques, narratives, and allegorical brilliance explored in this article, has enriched the fabric of Iranian and global cinema, igniting a flame of artistic exploration that continues to burn brightly. Kiarostami’s cinema is not merely a reflection of the past; it is a torch that lights the path toward a future where protest cinema remains a vital force, unearthing hidden truths, amplifying silenced voices, and speaking truth to power in the language of images and stories.
In this age of connectivity, the exchange of ideas and narratives is swift and profound. Kiarostami’s legacy reminds us that the power of cinema extends beyond entertainment; it has the capacity to transform societies, challenge oppressive regimes, and inspire individuals to strive for a better future. As we bid farewell to this exploration, we stand at the precipice of a new era of protest cinema, one that is enriched by the timeless wisdom of Abbas Kiarostami’s artistic legacy.
Aghagolzadeh, F. (2017). The Iranian New Wave: A Critical History. McFarland.
Ansari, A. (2009). Abbas Kiarostami: The Evidence of Film. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dabashi, H. (2001). Close Up: Iranian Cinema, Past, Present, and Future. Verso.
Godfrey, M. (Ed.). (2000). Abbas Kiarostami. University of Illinois Press.
Haghighi, R. (2018). Iranian Cinema and Globalization: National, Transnational, and Islamic Dimensions. Routledge.
Hatami, H. (2017). Contemporary Iranian Cinema: Identity, Society, Gender. I.B. Tauris.
Mirhosseini, S. M. (2015). Iranian Film and Persian Fiction: Re-Reading Persian Fiction Filmically. Palgrave Macmillan.
Naficy, H. (2011). A Social History of Iranian Cinema, Volume 4: The Globalizing Era, 1984-2010. Duke University Press.
Partovi, K. (Ed.). (2003). The Cinema of Abbas Kiarostami. Saqi Books.
Shahryar, M. (2015). Women Without Men: Aesthetic and Political Hybridity. In Women’s Cinema, World Cinema: Projecting Contemporary Feminisms (pp. 59-72). Duke University Press.
Shiva, K. (2018). Iranian Cinema in a Global Context: Policy, Politics, and Form. Routledge.
Ehrlich, L. (2018). Being and Becoming: Iranian Women Filmmakers and the Islamic Republic. Rutgers University Press.
Eskandari-Qajar, M. (2020). The Circumstance of Politics: Iranian Filmmakers Discuss Their Work. McFarland.
Gugler, J. (Ed.). (2005). World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives. Routledge.
Haghighat, A. (2017). Women and Politics in Iran: Veiling, Unveiling, and Reveiling. Cambridge University Press.
Keshavarz, F. (2011). Recasting Persian Poetry: Scenarios of Poetic Modernity in Iran. University of Utah Press.
Ranjbar, V., & Yahaghi, H. (2019). The evolution of Iranian cinema after the 1979 Islamic Revolution: A chronological review. In Iran’s Influence: A Religious-Political State and Society in Its Region (pp. 95-126). Springer.
About the author:
Dr. Hamed Soleimanzadeh is a film philosopher, film critic, filmmaker, researcher, and university lecturer, and he is currently an Einstein Junior Fellow at the Berlin University of the Arts (UdK).
© 2020 – 2023 Fantasize & Hamed Soleimanzadeh